My name is
Andreina Urena, and in this blog I am responding to an assignment in my ENG 101
composition class on climate change. The assignment asked me to read an article
in the New York Times “New York
Is Lagging as Seas and Risks Rise, Critics warn” by Minerva Navarro. In this
blog I will discuss the main points of this article as well as I have to focus
in the opinion of the “Reader’s Pick” of the article.
This article is
basically saying that New York City
is not prepared to fight climate change. For instance, the infrastructure of the
majority of buildings has not being built to resist a flood and since the city
is surrounded by water, then, New Yorkers should be aware of the magnitude that
a catastrophe like this could cause. In the other hand, the article also point
out that if NYC is hit by a flood, then, the city will have to spend billions
of dollars to restore it, and to prepare it for futures floods.
I agree with Jim
Gordon from the “Readers Pick” because he sounds very realistic when he says
that NYC “is like treating the symptoms without curing the disease.” Meaning
that the city should be aware of what is really causing sea water to rise like trying
to reduce carbon pollution which is one
of the most dangerous factor to contribute to climate change instead of being
thinking about constructing barrels to stop the water coming from the ocean
when they keep contaminating the air.
No comments:
Post a Comment